Monday, March 29, 2010

Tragedy of Pearl Harbor launches United States Maritime Strategy forward.

On December 7, 1941 the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor resulted in one of the greatest defining moments in history. The well-executed raid on the United States Navy’s Pacific fleet destroyed ninety ships and forced the Navy to completely change its maritime strategy. The new maritime strategy called for a greater reliance upon aircraft carriers as opposed to Battleships as a more effective strategy for maritime warfare. Although the events of that historic day were catastrophic, the lesson of that tragedy launched the Navy into the modern warfare tactics that are used today and documented in the United States National Maritime Strategy.

The current National Maritime Strategy defines key goals and objectives for the United States Navy. Specifically, the strategy outlines six goals:

  • Forward Presence
  • Deterrence
  • Sea Control
  • Power Projection
  • Maritime Security
  • Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Response


This strategy relies heavily upon the Navy’s force structure consisting of eleven aircraft carriers supported by over two hundred destroyers, cruisers, and auxiliary ships.

Note that not a single Battleship exists today in the United States Navy inventory of ships. Clearly, the aircraft carrier is the centerpiece of today’s maritime strategy and represents the most recognizable symbol of American naval supremacy providing five sovereign acres of United States territory that can be deployed in international waters at the will of the President.


Before 1941, Naval strategists debated whether Battleships or aircraft carriers provided the most capable firepower to accomplish the maritime mission. Battleship advocates favored its heavy caliber guns to deliver the firepower to conquer adversaries and ensure command of the sea. Compared to cruisers and destroyers, the Battleship’s heavy caliber guns provided far superior naval gunfire with ranges over twenty miles, but aircraft provided the capability to deliver ordnance for hundreds of miles. While Battleships enjoyed the reputation of providing supreme authority and control in naval operations, there was only a single fleet engagement of battleships during WWI to corroborate its exalted position. Nevertheless, the battleships reigned supreme as evidenced by its inventory advantage of eight battleships to three aircraft carriers on the eve of the historic Pearl Harbor attack.

The debate between the battleships and aircraft carriers was soundly resolved on Dec 7, 1941, when the Japanese delivered a fatal strike to the United States Pacific fleet using carrier-launched aircraft. The Japanese aircraft ironically destroyed eight American battleships and forever sealed the future of battleships by literally sending them to the bottom of the sea.

I believe that even without the events at Pearl Harbor, the United States Navy would have undoubtedly recognized the efficiency and supremacy of the aircraft carrier over the battleship. I have made this observation based on the relatively significant technological advances in aviation compared to lesser advances in ships. For instance, jet aircraft introduced in the early 1950s could fly faster, higher, and farther with more ordnance than WWII rotary aircraft, and thus were far more capable to wage lethal warfare. This fact alone would have ended the debate between battleships and aircraft carriers as the most capable war-fighting platform.


Today, the United States Navy has over 3700 operational aircraft, supported by 11 aircraft carriers and 286 deployable ships in its force. The Navy continues to advance and prepare itself to accomplish its maritime mission.


Even though December 7, 1941 was a tragic day in history, the United States learned a tremendous lesson on the power and lethality of carrier-based aircraft and the aircraft carrier. The tragedy at Pearl Harbor was the forcing function that drove the Navy to adopt the tactics and strategy used today.







8 comments:

  1. I agree with you that WWII did in fact have a great effect on today's batteships. But, technology has advanced since then and today the army doesn't necessarily use the same things as they did back then.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Aircraft carrier has its advantages and the Battleship has its own. I don't think it is really fair to say that the Battleship is worse than the Aircraft carrier. They are both needed in different situations, and Ally is right. As technology changes, the ships purpose changes too. Before, the Battleship was the most important ship. But I do agree that the Aircraft carrier was better in the Pacific. By the way, nintey ships did not sink during the attack on Pearl Harbor, only five did.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I do not think we should disown battleships forever, because they can be a good war device.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ally and Shane both bring up a good point. Technology today is different in the fact that the ships have new ways to work almost everything. But still, I think that disowning the old battleships should not happen. We can learn for the old ships to make our new ones better for battle or for whatever hits us.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Battleships could still be used today because technology has come up with so many new advantages to help and support through wars.I think they would be a useful tool to use in the military.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree that we should not disown our battle ships, It's not only a historical artifact but It shows how strong our country is, and what we have been through. It might be less needed, but why get rid of something with so much history?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I also agree that we should not disown our battle ships. They can teach us a lot about how our history was and the way we fought. Also, by keeping these battle ships we can correct the problems we had in the past and learn from our mistakes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The battleships that the US used to rely so heavily on should not be disowned as everyone has said. They should be put into museums. They could be used to show the progression of war strategy. They would be extremely useful for people who are serving on a ship today. They could be shown the old ship in order to appriciate the new ones even more.

    ReplyDelete

Obama Armenian Genocide